2012年9月5日 星期三

How to govern Taiwan - Part 3

Chen Yi 陳儀 (1883-1950) was the first post-war governor of Taiwan, appointed by Chiang Kai-Sek on Aug 29, 1945 and arrived in Taiwan with his entourage on Oct 24 to take up the office. On Oct 25, he presided over the surrender of the Japanese. And, as we all know, the 228 Incident of 1947 occurred under his failed governance.

Was he qualified to rule Taiwan? As it turned out, yes, at least on the surface:

(1) He was educated in Japan in 1902 and again in 1919 when he graduated from the Military Academy of Japan and also married a Japanese.
(2) In 1935, he visited Taiwan and was impressed by the rapid progress made under the Japanese rule. After more intelligence gathering, he published a report on Taiwan 台灣考查報告 in 1937.
(3) Also in 1937, he became the Provincial Chairman (Governor) of Fujian (Hokkien) and sought to reproduce the Japanese success of economic development in Taiwan.
(4) In anticipation of the return of Taiwan to China, in 1943, he chaired the Taiwan Survey Committee of the Nationalist Gov't and filed two reports, one an expansion of the previous survey and the other, the 台灣接管計劃綱要Outline of the plans for taking possession of Taiwan.

Similar to Goto Shinpei of the Japanese Colonial era, Chen Yi had also reached a number of conclusions from his exhaustive studies. Surprisingly and unfortunately, they were highly inaccurate and his strategy apparently based on China-centric views:

(1) Just like during the Qing rule, Taiwan was once again regarded as a conquered land. Chen et al had failed to realize that Taiwan was already on its way to becoming a modernized society with its people enjoying a much higher living standard than that in the war-torn China. The officials and the soldiers arriving from China in 1945-6, once again misbehaved as those during the Qing era. And the wealth and riches once again were looted by the governor's cronies.
(2) The gentry class, successfully used by the Japanese to help in the colonization of Taiwan was promptly labeled as traitors of the Han people and arrested and prosecuted. And those who had escaped persecution went silent. This class was replaced with a small group of Taiwanese who had fled the Japanese rule to reside in China, They, however, no longer enjoyed close kinship with the people of Taiwan. In fact, they were often ridiculed secretly as men of the Half-Mountain, a reference to their adaptation to the Chinese ways.
(3) The implementation of de-Japanization policies that suddenly inferiorized the Taiwanese intelligentsia and the emerging leadership, both consisting of physicians, lawyers, teachers, professors, writers, and artists [and most of them were wiped out during the 228 Incident in 1947].

The red flag above was the fatal flaw.

By 1942, 58% of the Taiwanese spoke and wrote Japanese. There were 1,019 elementary-junior high schools, 44 senior high schools, 117 vocational schools, 3 normal schools, and one full-fledged university (complete with a medical school). And among the young, by 1945, 80% had attended elementary school. This high literacy was, however, interpreted by Chen, not as a sign of modernization and an asset, but as that of slaverization and a black stain to be cleaned off. And to transform the Taiwanese back to Chinese, the language must be changed to Mandarin Chinese, the 國語official/national language of China, itself a dialect from Beijing (known to the Taiwanese as 北京話). On April 2, 1946, mandatory Chinese language education started. And all official businesses must be conducted in Chinese. In addition, as in April 1937 when the Japanese Colonial Gov't banned Chinese, on Oct 26, 1946, Chen prohibited the publication of all things written in Japanese. And writers and reporters who knew no Chinese lost their livelihood overnight.

Of course, it was never a simple language issue, Chen theorized that, "臺灣過去在日本帝國主義高壓統治之下,……在文化思想上更散播了無數的毒素,使臺灣同胞日日受其麻醉與薰陶,對祖國觀念模糊,逐漸離心,以遂「日本化」和「皇民化」的目的。……使臺灣同胞在不知不覺之中,自然而然的產生一種崇拜日本的自卑心理(in 《臺灣新生報‧1945年12月7日‧肅清思想毒素》)"
Translation: "In the past, Taiwan was under the tight control of Japanese imperialism, ...in order to achieve the goals of Japanization and imperial Japanification, [the Japanese] had spread numerous toxins to anesthetize and poison the cultural thinking on a daily basis, thereby gradually separating the Taiwanese from the idea of the motherland [i.e., China]. ...This has altered the mindset of the unsuspecting Taiwanese and changed it into one with an inferiority complex that worships Japan."

And how to "detoxify" the Taiwanese? Why, the Chinese language obviously must be re-introduced and through which, the Chinese culture as well, so that the Taiwanese could learn to discard the one that idolized Japan.

The disagreement was loud and clear, and immediate. Numerous rebuttals and editorials were published in contemporary newspapers. For example, an often quoted article by 王白淵 (1902-65) stated: "臺省在其各方面,既有具備近代民主社會建設的諸條件。許多外省人,開口就說臺胞受過日人奴化五十年之久,思想歪曲,似乎以為不能當權之口吻,我們以為這是鬼話,除去別有意圖,完全不對。……臺胞雖受五十年之奴化政策,但是臺胞並不奴化,可以說一百人中間九十九人絕對沒有奴化。只以為不能操漂亮的國語,不能寫十分流利的國文,就是奴化。那麼,其見解未免太過於淺薄,過於欺人。……現象與本質,應該要認清楚,不可以為一時的現象,例如臺胞慣用日文日語,或是帶著一點日人脾氣,或是不能說漂亮的國語,寫流利的國文,就說臺胞奴化變質或是沒有用。……臺胞雖是在日本高壓之下,但竟受過高度資本主義的洗禮,很少有封建的遺毒,在這一點我們以為台胞可以自慰(in 《政經報‧1946年1月25日‧告外省人諸公》.
Translation: "In every respect, Taiwan already is ready for modernization. Many Chinese declare that since the Taiwanese have been ruled as slaves for 50 years and are used to submissive thinking, they cannot be entrusted with power. We regard this as utter nonsense, rife with ulterior motive, and is totally wrong. ...The Taiwanese may have been ruled by slavery policies, but they are not slaverized. It is fair to say that out of 100, 99 absolutely have not been slaverized. If only because the Taiwanese cannot speak fluent Chinese and write in beautiful proses and therefore to mark them as having been slaverized is too superficial and a form of bullying. ...The manifestation and the reality must be distinguished. One must not regard a temporary phenomenon, for example, the Taiwanese are accustomed to using the Japanese language and at times exhibit Japanese behavior, and often they cannot handle spoken and written Chinese, it is not right to declare them warped and useless. ... Even though the Taiwanese have been ruled under high pressure by the Japanese, we have been exposed to high degrees of capitalism while retaining very little residual poison passed on from the old feudal system. We, the Taiwanese, surely can be proud of that".

It took the Japanese colonial gov't 50 years to reach an acceptable level of Japanese literacy. Even so, most Taiwanese still spoke their mother tongues at home. And yet, Chen boasted that the language reform could be accomplished within a short span of 4 years. To achieve this goal, he recruited a large number of Mandarin-speaking young men and women from China, to replace Japanese-speaking Taiwanese teachers. The latter must pass language exams in order to qualify for teaching again. Many did. However, the former frequently touted their 5,000 years of Chinese heritage and looked down on the Taiwanese as second-class cultural citizens, thus creating an instant disharmony.

[Above: Class of 1937/8 of 淡水女子公學校Tansui Girls' Public School, now 文化Wen-Hua Elementary School in Tamsui. In the front center, Taiwanese teacher 蘇淑姬. Courtesy of Fung-yin and the Cheng Family.]

In addition, the Chinese language requirement had other unpleasant consequences for the Taiwanese: (1) only Mandarin-speakers could become civil servants and (2) elections were limited to Mandarin-speaking candidates. In order to fill the vacant posts, the gov't imported mainland Chinese. And without candidates, the democracy process stopped dead in its tracks - long suspected as the ultimate motive of the new rulers of Taiwan that turned out to be true. To add insult to injury, the gov't claimed that Taiwan had no usable talents.

Yes, the Qing and the Japanese colonial rules all over again, and worse, this time, the governance was a combination of the two.

Chen Yi's governorship was terminated on March 22, 1947; although on Aug 6, 1948, he became the governor of ZeJiang Province, but was arrested in Feb, 1949 for plotting to defect to the Communists, a capital crime. He was sent to a prison in Taiwan in April, 1950, executed at 馬場町 in Wanhua on June 18 of the same year. Tens of thousands of Taiwanese gathered to witness the execution only to discover that it was already a done deal.


9 則留言:

  1. It's eye-opening to see a picture of Chen Yi. He looks like a Chinese warlord or a Japanese military officer in movies.

    It's a hard truth to swallow that Taiwanese intelligentsia (physicians, lawyers, teachers, professors, writers, and artists) were mostly wiped out during the 228 incident. I can pretend to be like an average German in 1941 and claim to have no knowledge of what the Nazis were really doing to the Jews and communists. But knowing it now I have to say that's terribly criminal. it's clear from history what horrible things the Chinese was capable of doing to others and to ourselves. I am a Chinese and a Taiwanese, for I was born in Taiwan and grew up there, while my parents came to Taiwan from China around 1949. I know there are things we Chinese should be ashamed of ourselves. And I hope those who had suffered in 228 and thereafter would find peace and a way to forgive.

    I am grateful for the state of democratic freedom Taiwan is enjoying right now. DPP's noises may well be the kind of inhibitor necessary to stop the KMT from returning back to dictatorship. But their untruthful noises are so psychologically painful to hear. Maybe it's not clear to some Taiwanese that under dictatorship political noises can't be publicly heard, therefore Taiwan is not under dictatorship anymore. Perhaps it's also not clear to some that democracy was only a method to counter the terror of unreasonable dictators. That's its sole function, nothing else. Democracy by itself is not a good way to govern. The rule of law that most find agreeable is.

    回覆刪除
  2. What's more, if one wants to solve any real public problem, then democracy is definitely not the way to go. Anyone can test this with some simple examples. See if you can get a decision made on where to go eat with a group of friends, or choose what TV show to watch together. One is lucky if most don't care one way or another. If some do care earnestly, then democratic vote will produce either stillbirth or monstrous outcomes. The proof is in a devil's dictionary: a camel is a horse designed by a committee.

    My opinion is that ideally good governance is an art in finding ways to procure cooperation and good will from the opposition, on top of the rule of law. Chen-Yi's way of de-Japanization of Taiwan was probably similar to Mr. Paul Bremer's banning of the Ba'ath Party and dismantling the Iraqi army. Terrible mistakes. But given the circumstances wasn't that the obvious way to go? Confucious's teaching of the hierarchical orders of Heaven, Earth, emperors/rulers, parents, and teachers was probably ineffective unless it was indoctrinated to pupils at an early age. To a thinking adult who can't be indoctrinated, the choices for governance are not many. 1) leave him alone, or 2) force him, or 3) find ways to entice him to cooperate. But the problem of choice #3 is that the cooperation may come at too steep a price, and the governor may be told to get lost. So, it's back to choice #2 then.

    Still, now is now. DPP should do better than just claiming they are leading Taiwan to democracy. Taiwan is already democratic. They can also do better than just finding faults with Mr. Ma or Mr. Wu. DPP is doing a terrible job at this. (see 11:30 minutes into this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ7UpACeWL4&feature=plcp) I think the DPP is trapped by the logic that in order to implement the master plan DPP has for Taiwan, they must first obtain power. And to obtain power they must first remove KMT from power. By so thinking all their efforts are focused on discrediting the leaders of KMT. There is one problem with this logic though: it goes against the adage 和氣生財, or harmony (cooperation) beget fortune. If DPP really loves Taiwan and wants to help it to be an economically comfortable place to live in, then maybe finding ways to cooperate with KMT is worth a try.

    About 李敖, I like him when he talks about the Chinese language and literature. Most of his arguments about history and politics are lined with wonderful examples and anecdotes, but his conclusions are not convincing enough for me. There's something odd about his use of logic. But he is a good story-teller and I'd love to listen to him teach the Chinese language in a college.

    回覆刪除
  3. Hi Herman,

    Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

    Despite its shortcomings, democracy is still the best way to go, for Taiwan. Of course it must be based on the rule of law - this is why Andy Chang argues that Taiwan's is subverted by a kangaroo court (カンガルー・コート). In this regard, you are in agreement with him although for entirely different reasons.

    For those who suffered greatly under the 228 and the White Terror, no amount of evidence will persuade them that the present-day Taiwan is a democracy. The perpetual hatred of KMT probably will never end, the wound is just too deep to recover from. This is quite sympathetic and understandable. For the rest of us, perhaps the emphasis should be on how to move Taiwan forward under very trying conditions. It is the only homeland we have.

    Back to the noises: In order to understand why DPP leadership behaves in such a quarrelsome manner, you have to know its origin. Its founders are no longer in power, either left in disagreement or kicked out, replaced by their original defending attorneys (in the aftermath of the Formosa Incident of 1979). This group is still in charge. Lawyers by trade win and lose through debates and the rise of the DPP was in fact based on arguing for, ironically, the rule of law, noisily by necessity at that time and a tradition by now.

    On the light-hearted side, Clint Eastwood's recent speech at RNC, especially the part on the attorneys may bring a smile:

    "I just think that there is so much to be done, and I think that Mr. Romney and Mr. Ryan are two guys that can come along.

    See, I never thought it was a good idea for attorneys to the president, anyway.

    I think attorneys are so busy — you know they’re always taught to argue everything, always weigh everything, weigh both sides. They are always devil’s advocating this and bifurcating this and bifurcating that.

    You know all that stuff. But, I think it is maybe time — what do you think — for maybe a businessman. How about that?"

    Of course, both Obama and Romney are lawyers, as are Ma Yin-jeou and Tsai Yin-wen. Democratic election always decides the outcome.

    回覆刪除
  4. I thought he was executed at Matingchang, Wanhua in 1950. Is that right. There is a plaque there to commemorate those who died at this killing field a few years earlier: http://patrick-cowsill.blogspot.tw/2006/08/2-28-memorial-at-ma-ting-cheng_16.html I thought it was a final irony that he also got his here. Was he executed somewhere else then?

    回覆刪除
  5. Hi Patrick,

    Thanks. Yes, Chen was executed in the early morning hours (ca 1AM) of 6/18/1950 at MaChangTing where many of the 228 victims were killed. The announcement of the execution date was published on the same day in the morning newspapers. Many readers mistakenly believed that it would be carried out later in the day. When words got around, people gathered to watch the most hated man in Taiwan getting his just punishment. Some even brought lunch to wait it out.

    His last words were to the executioner: "shoot straight".

    回覆刪除
  6. Great stuff Eyedoc, thanks! If you have any additional info on MaChangTing, please enlighten us! Speaking of de-Japanification, as a Taiwan history hobbyist (~!), its amazing that so many interesting images of the Japanese era have been hidden away. Even today I constantly find (and post to taipics.com) new images that I've never seen before.

    回覆刪除
  7. Marc? Guess we have literally passed by each other somewhere over the Pacific this time.

    Near the river in 馬場町MaChangDingばばちょうBaBaCho was the killing field where we as kids stayed away from (even now).

    I often check out your Taipics.com and have recommended it to many others. Keep up the good work!

    回覆刪除